Do you exist? David Hume, Carl Jung and Cognitive Neuroscience on the "Self"
David Hume thinks we don't exist. Carl Jung thinks we do. Here are the facts:
Introduction
What are you? Really? Can you introspect for a few hours and find something within you that makes you really you. Is there a self a stable sort of immaterial entity that maybe grows a bit over time? Or are you something else entirely - just a simple collection of experiences and ideas? Well, depending on whether you're a scientist or a philosopher the answers might be completely different. This concept of the “self” has puzzled philosophers and scientists alike for centuries. Let's talk about that.
Sponsor Message: Audiio
But first a quick word for my sponsor audiio: they're the best place to get high quality royalty-free music for your projects. They just sponsored me and my podcast so it makes it a little bit easier to do the work that I'm doing. Whether you're creating videos podcasts or anything in between audio has you covered - check them out today to get access to a massive library of tracks that will take your work to the next level. You can even use their AI tool Hans to find something that works exactly for your project based on the parameters that you put in there! So to get access to a composition from Hans himself use my code SAVE70 me at audiio.com.
Hume: The Self is an illusion
Today we're asking the question: Is there a "self”? David Hume didn't seem think so Hume is known for his irrationalist-empiricist philosophy. He argued that the self doesn't actually exist and what we call the “self” is something of an illusion that we tell ourselves to maybe comfort ourselves or make it easier to talk to other people, or something like that. In his Treatise of Human Nature (1739), Hume writes:
“When I enter most intimately into what I call ‘myself’ I always stumble on some particular perception. I can never catch myself at any time without a perception.” For Hume: The "self is a bundle of perceptions. A sort of “narrative illusion” that we convince ourselves of that's created by memory and learning and association - nothing more than a series of thoughts or sensations.
Jung: The Self as real
Carl Jung, the famous psychologist and psychiatrist saw the self in a very different light. He writes in Aion (1952): “The self is not only the center but also the whole circumference which embraces both conscious and unconscious.” For Jung: The self is real. A central archetype that guides us toward wholeness through the process of individuation. The journey is about integrating both the conscious and unconscious part of our mind.
Cognitive Neuroscience
Hume characterizes the self as an illusion, while Jung sees it as real: an ongoing process of growth and integration. But what does modern science tell us today?
Well, today modern cognitive and neuroscience gives us a new perspective: neuroscientists like Antonio Damasio (2010) suggest the brain’s Default Mode Network helps create a “continuous self narrative” much like Hume’s bundle of perceptions. Studies on split-brain patients suggest that the self is actually a modular process built from different parts of the brain that work together, similar to Jung’s idea of integrating opposites.
So what are we, really? Is the self just an illusion as Hume argued? Is it a real and unifying force as Jung believed? Or is the self a dynamic brain generated model as modern neuroscience seems to say? Maybe the truth is that it’s a bit of all three: an illusion, a journey and a construct. All at once.
References
Hume, D. A Treatise of Human Nature. 1739
Jung, C.G. Aion. 1952
Damasio, A. Self Comes to Mind. 2010
I think Hume was spot on with Bundle theory and as im diving into Mahayana (and Zen) Buddhism im becoming more and more curious of discovering what we can about the nature of the process we call self. Or just some sort of understating. Thoughts? Advice, perhaps? Thanks!
Very interesting. Thanks!
I have an opinion, too. ;)
https://open.substack.com/pub/unwindingwant/p/the-ego-isnt-the-enemy